see, by the time markets will get rational and start looking at the fundamental of tech beneath the coin, it will be too late.Right now is the time for creating network effects and I am super eagerly waiting for the realease of digi asset on android wallet and other wallet, such that other people can create their own assets.This will give the needed boost and also start the process of creating the network effect, just like etherem did, and now everyone is molding their projects to support ethereums smart contract language.
I said it earlier and I will tirelessly say it again. DigiByte at 80 sats is an insult to all the smart and passionate, dedicated people that spend their lifetime building a new economy. Everyone will benefit from it. Its price should be way above Ethereum.
AmSpec x V-ID Entering Oil & Gas sector with a global heavyweight! AmSpec will be one of the very few companies in its sector to sensibly apply state of the art blockchain technology. From now on, the V-ID blockchain tech will protect the AmSpec values against falsified reports; any report can now be verified whether it’s an original, or a copy. The digital fingerprint of the AmSpec reports will be stored on the Ethereum, LTO Network and DigiByte blockchains.
people in crypto just see it as a shitcoin because of low price, low market cap, and lack of documentation. People are still choosing more centralized chains because they offer easier tools for developers. Ethereum had a huge pre-mine which is how they built up the documentation necessary for developers to build on solidity.
ETh 1, 2, 3, n. It does not matter. Some of the worlds most worthless fiat still has a value greater than zero. Some of the world’s trash is worth something to someone. We don’t live in a zero sum game, and Ethereum’s success is completely discrete of DigiByte’s or any other projects success
Such anger is this room. Look, we all saw something great. It tanked. We were wrong. Its over. So what is the next coin to look at? It seems EOS, Ethereum, and Chainlink seem like hot coins these days.
as I have said many times DGB has to beat ethereum in terms of applications that gets build upon it, becuase currently other qualities of DGB are not required, like fast transaction, decenteralization, security etc they are needed but not demanded.hence people are voting to get a stable coin on the chain and more financial asset and different services to earn interest in this negetive interest environmentment set by the centeral banks.I highly request the community to demand more finance related services to be built upon the chain rather than developing chain further.jared asked same on twitter just let him know https://twitter.com/saltedlolly/status/1215584066692698113?s=20
no need to be optimistic for next 10 years, this project is not for financial gains, it is created to provide security to the internet through blockchain.You can build dapps on it, or application, but if you want to store sum data that is allowed.you are probably looking for some blockchain on which financial products gets made and digibyte is not that, you should look toward ethereum.if you want to secure login to your applications or site then you can impliment digi-id.or if you want to raise some money for project then you can release some assets on it. Just no decenteralized automation.
which application need digibyte, digibyte don't allow any application to be build upon it, but as a way for application to store some data and utilize it's digiasset functionality and with digi-id it provide security for login if an application needs it.So it is not like ethereum, the digiasset only require dgb for moving these assets, digi-id works without DGB. So what wrong am I getting here?
we should ask developers to build something over second layer, we always stuck on layer1 of the DGB, while ethereum and other project are going crazy by building over second layer.DGB needs second layers applications.